The BOA thinks that rules of the WADA on steroids are not good enough

The British Olympic Association tries to justify itself for the aspect that it breaks laws of the World Anti-Doping Agency. According to rules of the WADA, punishment for usage of anabolic steroids and other related preparations have to be the same in the whole  world. The penalty that is indicated for an athlete that has utilized forbidden medicines for the first time is sentencing to suspension of 2 years.
But the British Olympic Association claims that such penalty isn’t good enough. The BOA sentences steroid users for life-time bans from participating in the Olympics. The WADA claims that this rule of the BOA contradicts the WADA Code that is unvarying.
Lord Moynihan, the chairman of the BOA, hasn’t agreed to concede. As a result, a hearing has been scheduled to be at a Court of Arbitration for Sports in London.
The sportspersons that had used banned products were suspended by the International Olympic Committee from taking part in Olympics under the Osaka Rule.
Lord Moynihan confirmed that the law of the BOA connected with life-time suspensions wouldn’t be cancel, if even the CAS would be in contradiction with it. The BOA believes that it has the best rules.
Lord Moynihan supported statements written by the former British Olympic decathlete Daley Thompson that noted that British rules related to administration of prohibited preparations were the best. He noticed that they shouldn’t be overthrown by the rest part of the world.
Delay Thompson notes that cheaters have to be punished strictly. They should be banned for the whole life. According to his statements, the BOA shouldn’t agree with the law of the WADA to sentence dopers only for 2-year bans. He notices that the Britain desires to have the highest sport standards. He notes that if the rest part of the world doesn’t want to have high standards, it doesn’t mean that Britain must follow their reduced levels.
David Howman, the director general of the WADA, criticizes affirmations proclaimed by Daley, noting that steroid testing has been only on its early level of development, when he has won his gold medals in Olympics in Moscow and Los Angeles.
Travis Tygart, the CEO of the US Anti-Doping Agency, blames the BOA for its refusal to agree with the laws of the WADA. It seems to be strange that Travis Tygart that usually criticizes cheaters blames the BOA for the strict law.
Travis claims that since international laws have been once established and all have agreed to them, everyone must follow them.
Dwain Chambers and David Millar, British athletes, who have been earlier suspended for administration of prohibited medications wait for the conclusions linked with this issue. They want to know whether they will be allowed to take part in the 2012 London Olympics.

Aren’t you aware which form to take: Testosterone Propionate vs Enanthate?
Many persons, especially those that utilize or desire to use testosterone, frequently ask the following question: “Which version is more proper for athletic needs: Testosterone Propionate vs Enanthate?” These esters have different chemical structures which influence on differences that exist between these 2 forms of testosterone. Knowing structures of these forms of testosterone you may be capable answer on the following questions: “Which is more soluble: Testosterone Propionate vs Enanthate?” and “Which form has shorter length of action?” Having more carbons in the chain, Enanthate is less soluble in water and has longer length of action than Propionate. These differences may help you to choose a form which is proper for you.