Why has Tom Verducci voted for an admitted steroid user?

The American sportswriter Tom Verducci explains about debates connected with rughts of steroid users to be chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it commonly happens, this explanation shows only confusion of reporters about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA)  is a professional association of baseball journalists that elect players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All writers who are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have right to vote for up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently it was a debate between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or just suspected consumers of steroids and other forbidden medicines might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually have to comment their votes:  they should explain why they have voted pro or contra certain questions. Some of them claim that doping destructs the integrity of sports and usage of prohibited medications is often considered by them to be immoral.
As for Verducci, he doesn’t confirm that intake of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This sportswriter notices that steroids help users to take unfair advantage over those who don’t use controlled substances. According to this American sportswriter, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Thus, usage of forbidden drugs induces unfairness in sports.  That’s why Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. He claims that it is a question that is linked with performance but not to morality. So, this sportswriter supposes that consumers of steroids should not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for the admitted steroid user Jeff Bagwell. This sportsperson has acknowledged that he had administrated androstenedione. It is important to notice that this product was not classified as an anabolic steroid, when Bagwell took it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is enumerated among forbidden medicines. Since it wasn’t legally clamed to be a steroid, Tom Verducci decided to vote for the consumer of this medicine; however, it was always claimed to be an anabolic-androgenic steroid by scientists. Moreover, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t induce his performance due to administration of androstenedione.
Nonetheless, the decision of Tom Verducci to vote for the admitted consumer of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Tom Verducci is not against usage of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspeople?”  Since this sportswriter doesn’t believe that doping is a moral question, he may suggest that increase of performance is not a real problem.
Many persons suppose that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.