California legislators care about constitutional rights of athletes

Legislators of California claim that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspeople suspected of steroid use. So, sportspersons that have never tested positive for any prohibited products are investigated. That’s why the lawmakers presented a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars every year. This governmental office induces fighting against application of prohibited medications. Its goal is to uproot illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes connected with usage of illegal drugs, etc.
The request of California legislators was initiated soon after the 7-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime suspension from professional sports.
Everybody knows that Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his 7 titles obtained at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions totally.
In June Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, affirming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t desire to accept the lawsuit. He affirmed that the USADA acted properly. The judge also said that the USADA was formed in order to clean sports from sportspeople who take forbidden products.
California Senator Michael Rubio noted that the judge didn’t act appropriately, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators stated that the USADA violated rights of certain athletes. That’s why they initiated the request to Congress.

Barry Bonds says in interview what he believes about Lance Armstrong’s problems

Barry Bonds knows what an athlete experiences, if he/she is targeted by feds and anti-doping officers. He realizes what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspersons suspected of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports the cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a reporter asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong connected with doping accusations. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the seven-time Tour de France winner. He affirmed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Undoubtedly, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He knows what it means to be a good cyclist. After this person retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He took part in several competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, Barry Bonds sees that this sport has the same troubles like baseball. He understands that cyclists are pursued by the government and anti-doping officials like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were investigated by the government and anti-doping officials.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about application of forbidden products and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the athlete lied about usage of banned products. But feds affirmed that he was guilty of obstructing justice. Barry Bonds decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to prosecute the cyclist. The USADA claimed that Lance Armstrong had been applying banned drugs throughout his cycling career. The athlete decided to stop fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
However Lance Armstrong lost his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They confirm that he is the most excellent cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors continue to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. Thus, numerous persons are thankful. They will never forget what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by accusations linked with administration of prohibited drugs. The former baseball player thinks that his achievements during the baseball career are more essential than the suspicions. He believes that people will forget about the accusations and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk’s coach added steroid into her food

Nadezya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, received the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But she tested positive for a steroid. As a result, she forfeited the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests showed that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If an athlete is caught using any forbidden products, he/she is commonly sentenced to a suspension of two years. When it comes to this Belarusian shot putter, she received one-year suspension. Why was the sentence lighter? There were several circumstances that proved the following condition: Nadezya Ostapchuk didn’t use any forbidden drug intentionally.
At the beginning the shot putter blamed his former coach. She confirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency investigated this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also participated in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person put powder of methenolone into food of the shot putter during the last week before the 2012 London Olympics. The coach claimed that he had worried about the shot putter. He thought that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to comprehend why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the trouble.
Anti-doping officers accepted these arguments. That’s why the Belarusian shot putter received just one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that the Belarusian shot putter had not applied the steroid intentionally. They claimed that Yefimov just tried to protect the shot putter. They claimed that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If the Belarusian shot putter’s performance was great some months before the 2012 London Olympics, her trainer had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Why did former girlfriends of some athletes become targets of investigations?

Certain sportspersons that are suspected of steroid use become targets of the government. Feds do almost anything in order to determine whether several athletes have taken any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is wasted to disclose even private life of athletes. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can reveal the truth about administration of forbidden drugs. Thus, girlfriends of some sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been revealed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about certain details linked with private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about testicles of this baseball player. She reported that the athlete’s testicles were shrunken. So, her words served as a proof that Barry Bonds administered steroids and/or other prohibited products.
It is known that shrinkage of testicles belongs to unwanted consequences of several steroids. So, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that someone has applied some banned medicines. Consumers of steroids may prevent this side reaction, if they apply some medications for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former athlete had had erectile dysfunctions. The woman said that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during application of steroids. But if you study information about adverse reactions of steroids more attentively, you can understand that this effect is more likely to appear after discontinuation of administration. It happens because natural testosterone production is normally suppressed by application of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medications which have capacity to regenerate natural production of testosterone, erectile dysfunctions can be avoided.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also interviewed by feds. But questions have not been made public. According to some suggestions, she might have been asked also about sexuality of the cyclist.
Actually, the government has a mistaken point of view in this case. However shrinkage of testicles and erectile dysfunctions may occur because of steroids, these arguments are not suitable.

Steroid use may be unsafe for youth

Certain medicines are called “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these medicines represent? Why have been they called “performance-enhancing”? Various individuals may have different definitions. Let present what an adolescent believes! Before presenting her opinion it is important to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, had serious depression after administration of steroids. Ultimately, he committed suicide. He wanted to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other famous sportspersons who have taken steroids. But his life ended suddenly. His sister says that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous medicines. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young individuals that desire to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about dangers related to steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with application of anabolic steroids and other related medicines. He also uses slideshow presentations in order to explain that these medications can lead to such unwanted consequences, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver disorders, etc.
Don Hooton put efforts to teach young individuals about serious risks linked with usage of steroids. But he admits that it is not easy. He affirms that numerous young persons take doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they want to look like them. They follow their examples in order to improve appearance and have more endurance.
Unluckily, several parents believe that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them believe that their daughters don’t apply steroids because these medicines are recommended to add muscles and body weight in general. But according to some sources, girls also use steroids. They apply these preparations in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also applied to burn fat. That’s why grown-ups also should be educated about effects of steroids. Moreover, certain parents believe that their children don’t administer steroids because these medications are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to purchase steroids for a cycle.
It is affirmed that every16th high school student applies steroids. But this opinion is mistaken. Each 16th high school student admits to administering performance-enhancing drugs.   But many young people hide that they administer these medications.
Those that listen to Don Hooton’s explanations about steroids express their thanks. They are thankful that they may get knowledge about these medications.

Improvement of performance with drugs is blamed in fake world

Anyone knows that anabolic steroids are frequently demonized. If a sportsperson or a bodybuilder takes steroids and/or other performance-enhancing drugs, he/she is named a cheater. Journalists report about such athletes as about those who have destroyed their reputation. Anti-doping agencies put great efforts and spend money in other to define whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that certain sportspersons have taken steroids and/or doping products. It is confirmed that those that dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Many pieces of news describe the fight against steroids. But let see whether arguments against application of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to apply them.
It is claimed that steroid-using athletes serve as a bad example for children and young persons. It is known that youth sees a lot of sports stars that apply steroids and other related medicines. As a result, young persons want to look and be as strong, as these prominent sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely disputed about health risks connected with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can comprehend that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most frequently used arguments against administration of anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
According to the first argument, administration of steroids is closely associated with certain probable health dangers. Numerous articles warn about testicular atrophy and enlargement of heart which may occur on account of steroid use. However it may be true, let analyze our life. We eat unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Some persons apply antidepressants which are also quite unsafe. We are also involved in other unhealthy activities.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using athletes take unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they increase performance with these drugs. Let pay attention what happens in other fields, for example, in the world of entertainment.  Many actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play some roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of certain surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to bans.
While it is stated that steroid-using sportspersons send bad messages to young individuals who desire to look like them and follow their examples, no one mentions about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While feds pursue athletes who use steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act the same way.
It is clear that arguments against usage of steroids are quite weak. They show hypocrisy that reigns in our fake world.

Belarusian shot putter Nadzeya Ostapchuk applied steroid metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a shot putter from Belorussia won the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But she forfeited the medal because she was caught using the anabolic steroid metenolone (methenolone). She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read steroid scandals, you must know that professional sportspersons and bodybuilders are usually caught using other steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught taking metenolone. It is unusual, according to affirmations of anti-doping officers. What does this forbidden drug represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily use this preparation for enhancement of performance?
Metenolone belongs to anabolic steroids. It possesses slight androgenic properties. It acts like testosterone, increasing muscle mass and adding strength.
However this steroid possesses just weak androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male characteristics in females. Women that apply this product may face usual signs of virilization: the voice deepens; hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This medicine can be administered orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) benefits greatly, when it is used by athletes during their trainings. It is not administered during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is applied only on the day of a competition.
It is also stated that it is easy to detect those that take this anabolic steroid.
Undesirable consequences of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend upon doses which are administered. They are following: water retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, hirsutism, acne, hair loss, menstrual problems, enhanced libido, etc.
So, if you see a female athlete that has deep voice and hirsutism, you may accuse her of doping. Actually, it is wrong because these troubles may occur also in those women that don’t apply any steroids. But sometimes these effects manifest that certain women administer medicines which have androgenic properties.

Australian doctor Peter Grant is widely known by bodybuilders/athletes

Some doctors abuse their position, prescribing medicines which don’t correspond to therapeutic needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that some drugs are claimed to be prescription preparations. It means that you can’t buy them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such medicines. It is illegal to buy steroids without a prescription in several countries. Those that do it may be punished. They may be sentenced to imprisonment and/or fines. Of course, a lot of persons seek methods to buy and use these preparations without having legal problems.
Anabolic steroids are frequently abused. Many sportspersons and bodybuilders take these drugs not for therapeutic purposes but for enhancement of performance. If they live in countries where these medications can’t be bought legally without prescriptions, they find some ways to mask their illegal purchase and application. Athletes, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their physicians to prescribe them these products, as if they had clinical needs to administer them. Thus, several health care providers induce selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a situation.
Peter Grant, an Australian doctor, recommended steroids to 14 persons during 9 years. Medical state of these persons didn’t require usage of these medications. So, the health care provider was accused of inappropriate practicing medicine. For example, he prescribed to a patient taking such drugs, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to recommend these medications to this person. Moreover, these medicines were recommended him during 9 years.
The doctor Peter Grant acknowledged that several patients were competing. Thus, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to reading scientific information about anabolic steroids. He confirmed that he knew how steroids worked. So, he supervised the patients that administered anabolic steroids.
Taking these factors in consideration, it is possible to confirm that the doctor Peter Grant was better known by those who used steroids for increase of performance than by those that had to be treated from several diseases. Peter Grant affirmed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients just for personal use.
When the doctor appeared in the court, the judge affirmed that the physician induced selling steroids. The judge noted that Peter Grant had to be punished properly. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for 12 months. Furthermore, the judge claimed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Government intended to question former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong

The American professional cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had administered EPO and other forbidden products.
Many individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation related to Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the sportsperson was also targeted. She had to appear in the court. Some sports writers reported that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow were considered to be one of the most famous couples. They spent much time together. Sheryl Crow lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with the athlete during his trainings. They were in a close relationship, when Lance Armstrong won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton confirmed that Lance Armstrong had administered forbidden medicines. They also affirmed that the cyclist had been the leader of a doping team. In addition to these affirmations, they said that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment used for usage of prohibited products. These individuals were going to testify against Lance Armstrong. They noticed that Lance Armstrong had won Tour de France 7 times with the help of controlled substances.
As for the musician Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the cyclist was dropped before the hearing.
While federal prosecutors dropped the case, the USADA continued to prosecute the former athlete. As a result, Lance Armstrong lost his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not affected at all. Sponsors continue to support him and donate. Although his titles are stripped, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many persons in their efforts against cancer.

Does Derek Jeter use performance-enhancing drugs?

Skip Bayless, a journalist of the channel ESPN2, accuses Derek Jeter, a baseball star, of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
In fact, Skip Bayless doesn’t have any evidence in order to suggest that Derek Jeter administers prohibited substances. Despites this fact, the statements of the ESPN2 journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, the reporter started to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He noticed that the MLB’s tests for prohibited medicines are not good enough to detect those who take banned drugs.
The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view related to testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test which is performed in the MLB. This method is not good enough to detect those who apply banned products. Instead of this method, it is necessary to use another. Carbon isotope ratio is more appropriate.
The ESPN2 journalist also noticed that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this medication is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this medicine should be performed more times during year. Otherwise, players may use this preparation and avoid detection.
So, the journalist thinks that Derek Jeter takes HGH and prohibited products. Skip Bayless also notes that if he were a baseball player, he would take HGH.
Thus, the ESPN2 journalist supposes that MLB players use HGH and probably other prohibited products without being detected by the anti-doping system.
It is quite evident that the steroid era in baseball has not ended. Professional baseball players apply various forbidden medicines and avoid detection. But no one can accuse an athlete of doping, basing only on improper drug testing. It is necessary to focus on facts, accusing a person of intake of prohibited products. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Melky Cabrera’s hoax is revealed

It happens often that when athletes test positive for any prohibited medicines, they try to prove that they have never administered any prohibited preparation intentionally. They are looking for various ways to display that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to escape from bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for the anabolic steroid testosterone. Of course, he was sentenced to a suspension. Like other athletes he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and prevent the suspension.
A lot of doping sportspeople that are caught confirm that they have administered a dietary supplement which caused positive for certain forbidden substance. However several athletes may have taken fake dietary supplements, numerous sportspersons apply steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in many cases.
So, Melky Cabrera confirmed that he had taken a dietary supplement that resulted in his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a hoax. Trying to escape from the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements which induced selling it. The product didn’t exist in reality. It was just a lie of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the professional baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB exposed the baseball player and Juan Nunez. Thus, the baseball player was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES got troubles as well. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were accused of involving in the hoax. But these persons affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the site and the hoax that was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had nothing to do with this hoax.
The Food and Drug Administration is still investigating the case. It is not clear yet whether other persons would be also pursued and punished for the lie.

Australian newspaper: prostitutes in Bangladesh are injected with anabolic steroids

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained four individuals who possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle these products to Bangladesh. The medications were confiscated and these persons were detained.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this case, claiming that 4 men were arrested while they wanted to traffic steroids that were intended for administration by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This report surprised some persons. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper inform about? Do prostitutes apply the same drugs like sportspersons and bodybuilder that try to improve their performance, increasing muscle size and endurance? Why do prostitutes administer anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Some individuals realized that it was wrong to suggest that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t take anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes use corticosteroids which differ from anabolic steroids totally. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They are able to increase performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids increase muscle mass and lower fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and enhance body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids administered by prostitutes. Those who administer this preparation look healthier and more attractive. Thus, such prostitutes who apply this medicine have more clients.
A prostitute who administers Orexadon affirms that she is able to serve up to 15 clients per day.
Thus, it is possible to conclude that prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids which are normally indicated for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more appropriate drugs for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper published a false piece of news. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t try to smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Recommendations related to recovery with HCG and Clomid

When you buy steroids for cycles, you should also prepare such drugs which must be administered to get recovery after administration of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG must be administered during the cycle. It is important to take in consideration that this preparation is administered only during steroid cycles.
There such remedies which must be used after steroid use. For example, Clomid should be administered after steroid cycles. It is recommended to start applying this product after androgen levels fall substantially and recovery with this medicine becomes possible. It is ordinarily recommended to start administering Clomid with a high dose (300 mg/day) and reduce it gradually till 50 mg a day. Then decreased doses are used until steroid users become convinced that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their usual size.
If Clomid is administered about 6 weeks and no improvement is observed, it is needed to interrupt application of this remedy. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is required to continue applying Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to administer this medicine a year. Several studies have demonstrated that long-term usage of this preparation doesn’t cause grave problems. However several persons may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these problems are not irreversible. They disappear after discontinuation of intake. If any troubles linked with vision system appear in those that take Clomid, they must discontinue taking this product.
Clomid may be also administered after steroid use. A common measure is 75 mg daily in such situations.
However there are such products which help to get recovery after steroid use and maintain strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to apply prolonged steroid cycles.

Clomid and Nolvadex during steroid cycles and for PCT

Numerous individuals often ask which preparation is more suitable for a PCT: Clomid or Nolvadex. While several consumers of steroids affirm that Clomid is better for this purpose, others claim that Nolvadex is more proper. Some persons confirm that Clomid and Nolvadex should be combined.
When you evaluate structures of these preparations, you can see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have certain similar properties. But the most of people and even scientists confirm that Clomid and Nolvadex are wholly different preparations. Which basis does this opinion have? These drugs are utilized in medicine for various needs. Nolvadex is indicated for treatment of breast cancer in women. When it comes to Clomid, it is applied in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are wholly various products.
Actually, they may be also used for various needs in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is recommended in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is usually used as an anti-estrogen medicine.
Comparing potency of these medications, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex are able to lower estrogen levels, stimulating hypothalamus to secrete greater quantities of testosterone.
When it comes to doses of these preparations, they differ because one of them is more powerful than another. Clomid should be applied in higher dosages. Thus, such dosages of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, lead to more obvious effects than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most potent anti-estrogen. Such products, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such combinations are usually administered in case of abnormal development of breast tissues.
When you want to choose which drug you should use: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account some aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural secretion of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noticed, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these positive features, Nolvadex is safer. Moreover, Nolvadex leads to less dangerous adverse reactions than Clomid because lower dosages are required to cause wanted effects. Moreover, while undesirable results of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of administration. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to keep more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, consumers of steroids can make their choice properly.