Government couldn’t make jurors to believe that Roger Clemens was guilty

Names of 12 individuals (four men and eight women) who served as jury at the case against Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government desired the jury to be convinced that Roger Clemens had lied before the Congress about application of steroids and HGH. But since the jury didn’t believe it, the government criticized the individuals who acted as the jury. Some individuals that served as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf kids, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy were included in the jury.
The political activist Joyce Robinson-Paul was interviewed by the New York Daily News some days after Roger Clemens was acquitted. She confirmed that the jury understood that they had to be fair to both the federal prosecutors and Roger Clemens. But they didn’t find anything that had to be prosecuted.  Later she also affirmed that the federal prosecutors were not capable to prove their accusations.
Bradford Weaver, an employee of the Canadian Embassy confirmed that the government acted wrongly. He noticed that such cases should not happen again. He also claimed that there was nothing to be pursued. He was interviewed by the Associated Press. He also confirmed that each juror understood from the very beginning that Clemens was not proven guilty of any charge. Weaver pointed that every juror was unanimous.
The employee of the Canadian Embassy was also asked whether he considered that Roger Clemens really administered steroids. Journalists of the Associated Press also asked him whether he believed that the governmental case against Roger Clemens represented just the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But Bradford Weaver refused to answer the questions.
Another juror who chose not to be named noted that the jurors didn’t understand how the government could spend large sums of money during five years in order to prosecute the baseball player. This person confirmed that it was impossible to understand why the prosecution lasted for five years.
Other jurors didn’t provide any information.
As for feds, they seemed to be wholly disappointed. They declined to respond to the affirmations pronounced by the jurors.